New iPod Shuffle

March 12th, 2009

ipod-shuffle-3g

I gen­er­ally love every­thing Apple usu­ally releases, espe­cially their line of iPods which seem to be get­ting bet­ter over time, includ­ing new fea­tures, larger stor­age sizes and cheaper prices, but I must put my foot down and oppose the new iPod Shuf­fle. First of all, how was the 2nd Gen­er­a­tion Shuf­fle not small enough in size? The new ver­sion fea­tures a ‘much smaller size’, I’m sorry but I don’t think I’d enjoy los­ing my new Shuf­fle three days after I bought it because it slipped out of my hands and for­ever got lost in a sofa. Also, I’m not sure about you, but hav­ing a robot voice tell me what song I’m lis­ten­ing to isn’t an appeal­ing fea­ture, in fact I think it com­pletely takes away from the organic expe­ri­ence of hav­ing a Shuf­fle. I had a 2nd Gen­er­a­tion Shuf­fle and loved it. It allowed me to expe­ri­ence my music in a new way, I wasn’t dis­tracted by con­stantly see­ing what song I was lis­ten­ing to, but my music just flowed with my day either via full album or a won­der­ful mix.

I think in the case of the new ver­sion Apple was try­ing too hard to pro­mote new fea­tures with­out accept­ing was was already great about the prod­uct. I think that in new devices hav­ing a voice over com­mand is a good idea, but with the Shuf­fle, need­ing to spend 5 min­utes to get to an option to change your playlist seems coun­ter­in­tu­itive, espe­cially con­sid­er­ing that most peo­ple would prob­a­bly be using the device while run­ning. I think the best fea­ture about the new prod­uct is it’s upgrade in size, with­out increase in price, $79 seem­ing to be the high­est most peo­ple are will­ing to pay for some­thing the size of a paper­clip. In addi­tion, mov­ing the con­trols to the ear­buds is also a good idea, con­sid­er­ing, unlike the iPhone you’ll always be using your ear­buds when using the device. All and all I would have to con­sti­tute the new gen­er­a­tion of the iPod Shuf­fle as a fail, but as with other iPods Apple will most likely go back and forth between the designs while fig­ur­ing out what users really want (see the iPod Nano size and ori­en­ta­tion between pre­vi­ous versions).

1 Comment(s)

  • Ray says:

    While I feel you’re over-exaggerating your com­plaints a bit, I will say that the argu­ment of “it’s too small/thin” has been lev­eled on pretty much every new iPod announce­ment for as long as I can remem­ber. Yet every time we look at the older iPod’s we think, “man, those were huge!” I come to expect these things to be smaller than I what I expect/need and that’s part of what gives these devices their magic.

    I hon­estly don’t see the prob­lem of the Shuf­fle speak­ing infor­ma­tion about a track unless it auto­mat­i­cally did it every sin­gle time… which it doesn’t. If for some rea­son you wanted to know what the song is, you now have an abil­ity to find out. But you don’t have to. In my opin­ion, that’s a nice lit­tle fea­ture to have.

    My only main com­plaint is the design — it’s just too bland for my tastes.

  • Share Your Thoughts